Pres. Joe Biden’s alleged use of the same autopen signature on most official documents has reignited questions about his mental acuity and whether he “actually ordered the signature of relevant legal documents,” according to a report published by a Heritage Foundation arm.
“WHOEVER CONTROLLED THE AUTOPEN CONTROLLED THE PRESIDENCY,” X issued Thursday by the Oversight Project, a project under the conservative Heritage Foundation that analyzes the government to help transparency.
Throughout Biden’s administration, we collected any and all documents bearing his signature. With the exception of last year’s statement of the former president’s withdrawal from the campaign, all of them utilized the identical autopen signature. The gang said on X, “Here is the autopen signature,” with visual samples to back their claim.
A machine-generated signature, as opposed to a genuine handwritten one, is called an autopen signature.
Three documents bearing Biden’s signature have been made public by the Oversight Project. These include two executive orders and the president’s statement announcing his withdrawal from the 2024 presidential election. The identical signature—which seemed to consist of a line followed by “R. Biden Jr.”—was seen on both the 2022 and 2024 executive orders.
The document announcing Biden’s withdrawal from the 2024 run differed from the other two that the Oversight Project had provided, displaying a signature that was less legible than the one on the executive orders.
Nevertheless, last year, Biden and his administration were subject to intense scrutiny and worry over his mental acuity.
At the beginning of 2024, Biden was leading the Democratic Party in its re-election campaign, which was developing into a showdown with Trump. After years of conservatives doubting the president’s mental competence, Biden’s 81 years of age and mental clarity came under public investigation in February of that year.
Robert Hur, the special counsel who was looking into allegations that Biden mishandled classified documents while VP, announced that he would not suggest criminal charges against Biden for having retained classified materials after leaving that position. Hur described Biden as “a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.”
The revelation rekindled the intense criticism over Biden’s mental competence, which had already reached a peak in June 2024 following the president’s sole presidential debate with Trump.
In the days preceding up to his disastrous debate with Trump, Biden was the target of criticism for a number of slip-ups, such as when Obama seemed to drag him off the stage at a ritzy fundraiser by grabbing his wrist and guiding him back to the other world leaders when he looked to look at a parachutist at the G-7 summit.
On debate day, Biden faltered miserably, stumbling over his remarks and giving the impression that he lost his line of thought when he faced up against Trump. Many conservatives and longtime Democratic supporters urged the president to step aside from the campaign after his dismal performance in the debates.
In July, Biden announced his withdrawal from the campaign, and the signature on that formal document differed significantly from the signature on his EOs.
Andrew Bailey, the Republican attorney general of Missouri, demanded on Wednesday that the Department of Justice investigate if Biden’s “cognitive decline allowed unelected staff to push through radical policy without his knowing approval.”
“There are profound reasons to suspect that Biden’s staff and political allies exploited his mental decline to issue purported presidential orders without his knowing approval,” according to the document.
“Speaker Johnson, for example, reported that staff and elected officials – including former Vice President Kamala Harris and former Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer – tried to prevent Johnson from meeting with Biden,” said the study.
Democrats in Congress, Biden’s donors, and Biden’s and previous administrations’ staff all agree that, while every president has his guardians, Biden had far higher walls and stricter restrictions. When it came to communicating with other people and gathering information, Biden’s staff severely restricted his access.
Within their thread examining Biden’s signature on official papers, the Oversight Project released Bailey’s letter along with an interview with Speaker Johnson, R-La., who recalled that Biden had forgotten signing an order to restrict new exports of liquefied natural gas in 2024.
According to Johnson’s account, the president stated, “I didn’t do that,” when she spoke with Bari Weiss of the Free Press in January.
“I am aware that you halted it, sir. The state where I live has the export terminals. “This is doing massive damage to our economy and national security,” Johnson claimed he warned the president at the time. He had already spoken to those folks in his state and again this morning.
“I walked out of that meeting with fear and loathing because I thought, ‘We are in serious trouble – who is running the country?’” “The 2024 meeting,” Johnson stated.
“Like, I don’t know who put the paper in front of him, but he didn’t know,” said the man.
According to the Oversight Project, it is important to find out “who controlled the autopen” under Biden’s administration.
The identity of the person controlling the autopen and the existence of any checks must be ascertained before investigators can ascertain whether or not then-President Biden had the mental ability to command the signature of pertinent legal papers. This is a truth that can be proven through the proper legal channels, considering that President Biden chose to strip Trump’s advisers of Executive Privilege during his first term in office. X was mentioned in the Oversight Project.
Outrage among conservative social media users has been triggered by concerns about Biden’s mental acuity during his presidency and the findings of the Oversight Project. These users are questioning if Biden personally signed the executive orders.