The Claim Even Democrats Can’t Defend: Why David Marcus Says Women Voter ID Arguments Are Failing

The Democrats’ most recent outrageous falsehood on Republicans’ role in bringing the nation closer to fascism has been released, and it is quite remarkable. Now we’re supposed to think that Trump and the Republicans are trying to prevent married women from voting.

Beware of Spoilers: They aren’t.

“House Republicans’ so-called ‘SAVE Act’ blocks nearly 70 million women from registering to vote—just because they changed their name after marriage.” This week, Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., and others went on video to make the absurd and illogical assertion.

Clinton, who was unsuccessful in breaking the glass barrier, stated: “The House just passed the Republican voter suppression measure that threatens voting access for millions of Americans, including 69 million women whose married names don’t match their birth certificates.”

Voting in federal elections now requires proof of citizenship per the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act. A valid U.S. passport, a military ID, or a driver’s license that complies with REAL ID requirements are all acceptable forms of identification to prove citizenship.

I know you’d think getting a driver’s license would be easy, but blue-state Democrats messed it up by approving licenses for undocumented immigrants whose paperwork couldn’t be confirmed. Now that illegal immigrants are getting driver’s licenses like candy, the rest of us have to seek further verification for ours.

Republicans will disenfranchise married women since Democrats are now implying that they can’t get verified identity, which Republicans will use to twist their handlebar mustaches and kick puppies.

Why is there an almost continuous queue of married women in cars ahead of me at the school pick-up line if they are unable to acquire IDs like a driver’s license? I’d want to ask Rep. Swalwell this.

In addition, I have heard that married ladies frequently travel internationally. Since they are unable to obtain a passport, how is this even possible? Could their spouses be bribing immigration officials?

We ought to address the problem if it is indeed blocking married women from obtaining ID. This “major problem” was completely unknown until Republicans brought up the idea of a voter ID bill, so it raises some eyebrows.

The fact that the left continues to rush headfirst into simplistic identity politics is particularly telling, considering that as many as 80% of Americans favor requiring voters to produce proper identification in order to cast a ballot.

The Democrats win this time. They quickly begin shouting out messages in unison, as if competing in a skywriting tournament. For example, last month, they all began swearing like Andrew Dice Clay.

Claiming that married women would be disproportionately affected or unfairly disadvantaged by the voter ID law is a hazardous tactic repeatedly used by the Democrats, regardless of how cosmically foolish and obviously wrong it is.

If we want safer streets, minorities and the poor will be jailed more frequently, protecting women in sports would be a violation of trans rights, and now married women don’t know how to acquire IDs, so the Democrats say.

Everything here is “disparate impact ad absurdum.” The Act must be repealed if it has any detrimental impact on any person in the United States who is not white, straight, or cis.

Democrats, meanwhile, advocate for measures like student debt relief that disproportionately affect those Americans who did not complete their bachelor’s degree, but they frame this bias as a progressive movement.

The fact that married women tend to vote Republican is the icing on the cake when it comes to the GOP’s absurd desire to strip voting rights from everyone with a “Mrs.” or, as Democrats see it, “his or her” prefix.

Why would the GOP even consider letting those votes go when new polls suggest that Republicans and Trump would have won even more in 2024 if everyone had voted?

What the Democrats really have on their hands is an issue with reality. According to Swalwell, there are 70 million married women in the US who may have adopted their husband’s surname. This implies that 70 million people in the US are well-aware of how easy it is to get a legitimate ID.

Married women, please cast your ballots. Effortlessly accomplish what you set out to do.

Trump’s Gains With Black Voters...

In 2024, Black voters were overwhelmingly in favor of President Trump. Conservative Black operatives, however, are sounding the alarm...

When Lobbyists Become Trump Officials:...

Clients doing business with the Justice Department have become fond of one Washington, DC, lobbying firm during the past...

Shapiro: Kamala Must Explain Silence...

Former Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro said on ESPN's Stephen A. Smith that former vice president Kamala Harris "going to...

‘New World With Trump’: Dems’...

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and his party are grabbing a new fight with President Trump, a high-stakes bet...

More like this

Flashback Fury: Mamdani’s Bid to Silence Kirk in Queens

Zohran Mamdani, a socialist running for mayor of New York City, had previously signed a letter that referred to the conservative activist Charlie Kirk—who...

EU’s Israel Squeeze: Why Trump Isn’t Biting on Allies’...

Despite mounting international criticism on Israel over its invasion of Gaza, President Trump will not join his European friends in doing so. The president,...

The Barr Bombshell: How His Words Shred Dems’ Epstein-Trump...

On Tuesday, the House Oversight Committee made public a transcript of former Attorney General Bill Barr's deposition, which, according to the Republican claims, shows...